All posts
Published
June 23, 2025

3 actions to boost external communication efforts in 2023

The Speyside Communications team recommends an end-of-year strategic review that goes beyond vanity metrics. Our Corporate Affairs approach involves a deep analysis of message resonance, competitor strategy, and "white space" opportunities. This methodology ensures our clients in high-growth and emerging markets build resilient and impactful communications plans for the year ahead.

The Speyside Communications team recommends an end-of-year strategic review that goes beyond vanity metrics. Our Corporate Affairs approach involves a deep analysis of message resonance, competitor strategy, and "white space" opportunities. This methodology ensures our clients in high-growth and emerging markets build resilient and impactful communications plans for the year ahead.

Originally published in Bulldog Reporter

The last months of the year are the right moment to set objectives for a new cycle but also to observe what has worked and what could be done better in the year ahead. In order to implement a renewed external communications strategy that considers the needs of the business, we recommend to analyze, measure and understand what works and what doesn’t, observe the competition and identify spaces of opportunity for communication.

Let’s take a closer look at each of the actions mentioned above:

1. Measure what matters: what works (or not) and why?

Number of clicks and ad equivalency are two of the most used metrics in the world of external communication. However, they are not always the most effective way to evaluate your PR efforts. Before choosing the metrics, it is necessary to understand the placement of your company in the market – did it recently arrive to the country? Is it offering something new or unknown to customers?  what is your message competing against?

Some examples are: have we reached new media and therefore new audiences? Have we improved our performance Q vs Q? are our messages being prominent in the narrative? Are we being innovative in the way we do our storyetelling if we review our efforts over time?

Understanding the context in which the messages are transmitted will make it easier to establish metrics to corroborate the impact achieved. Moreover, these metrics can evolve with time and the company’s objectives.

2. Don’t get the big picture of your competition, go for the detailed perspective

Observe your competitors with detailed attention, not only in terms of the results they are getting.  Recognize as much as you can how they are rolling out their strategy, which messages they are positioning and the channels where they are getting the best results. With this information, you can identify the topics where the competition is a thought leader (and how, through public relations, it is possible to start gaining ground), the subjects where they lack knowledge, and the saturated topics that are not newsworthy anymore for the media and the audience.

In addition, it is a way to identify good practices and to recognize mistakes that have resulted in crises, and that we must avoid.

3. Look for white spaces of opportunity

This action depends on the previous ones, since by understanding the context in which we are positioning the brand’s messages and knowing the competition, it is easier to identify new communication opportunities or point out some strategy that we have missed this year and that can be exploited in 2023.

For example, you may have a spokesperson who is an expert on a new topic that is gaining notoriety in the media and is in line with the brand’s key messages. In this case you can create valuable content about it – beyond mentioning the advantages of one of the brand’s products or services – and manage opportunities where the star spokesperson and the journalists covering the topic can get to know each other.

The lessons learned from implementing these three actions will provide a stable foundation to create a new external communications plan. This doesn’t mean it can’t be adapted as the needs of the company and the media change, but it does offer a safer road to travel.

Conclusion

By shifting focus from surface-level results to deeper analysis—like message resonance, media reach, and storytelling quality—companies can better understand their PR impact. Monitoring competitors offers strategic insights, while uncovering white spaces reveals fresh opportunities for visibility and thought leadership. Together, these actions provide a strong, adaptable foundation for building a more effective communications plan in the year ahead.

Recent News

View All News
Public Affairs

How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of the complex operating environment in sub-Saharan Africa by unpacking How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC. Last revised through major amendments in 2018, the DRC’s regulatory framework, governed by the Mining Code and Mining Regulations, seeks to balance mineral sovereignty with international investments. While the government has made notable efforts to improve compliance by aligning its policies with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), the operational landscape remains heavily characterized by severe implementation gaps, infrastructure bottlenecks, and institutional capacity constraints. For global mining and energy investors, navigating the country's strategic cobalt, copper, and gold reserves requires a sophisticated approach to rising fiscal demands, strict local ownership requirements, and rapidly shifting geopolitical alliances.
Read post
Latin America

How do I get a product approved through ANVISA in Brazil without it taking five years?

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on accelerating market entry within Brazil's healthcare sector by analyzing how to optimize ANVISA Approval Times. A widespread perception among international life sciences firms is that navigating Brazil's national health regulator is a prohibitive, five-year endeavor. However, an operational analysis reveals that this timeline is rarely driven by the statutory framework itself, which mandates legal review deadlines of 120 days for priority cases and 365 days for ordinary ones. Instead, prolonged market access bottlenecks are primarily structural and behavioral, caused by mismatched dossier formatting, a failure to utilize optimized fast-track sub-categories, and falling into successive technical clarification cycles (fila de exigências). To counter these systemic delays, multinational corporations (MNCs) must pivot toward a sophisticated regulatory strategy built on regulatory reliance pathways, early alignment with optimized priority definitions, and precise tracking of ANVISA’s shifting technical parameters.
Read post
Social License To Operate

What is the difference between a legal permit and a social license for mining companies?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of an increasingly critical barrier to capital deployment in the global extractive sector: The Difference Between a Legal Permit and a Social Licence. While a legal permit grants a mining enterprise the formal, statutory approval from local authorities to operate, it represents only one half of the execution equation. This briefing explores why a social licence to operate—defined as the complex political, economic, and social dynamics within local communities—is equally indispensable for long-term project delivery. Without a resilient framework for community alignment, operations face severe reputational and operational risks, where local stakeholders can effectively block projects through strikes, legal challenges, protests, and infrastructure disruption. To mitigate these cascading bottlenecks, international mining companies must shift from purely transactional compliance to active, culturally attuned stakeholder engagement.
Read post