All posts
Published
June 23, 2025

Modi 3.0: A mandate under new circumstances

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BJP-led alliance (NDA) won India’s 2024 general election but lost its majority, making Modi dependent on coalition partners for the first time in a decade. Speyside Asia Pacific analyzes the corporate affairs challenge in this high-growth market. Regional parties and the resurgence of the opposition—especially Congress under Rahul Gandhi—will significantly influence policymaking, potentially complicating key reforms and shifting political dynamics.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BJP-led alliance (NDA) won India’s 2024 general election but lost its majority, making Modi dependent on coalition partners for the first time in a decade. Speyside Asia Pacific analyzes the corporate affairs challenge in this high-growth market. Regional parties and the resurgence of the opposition—especially Congress under Rahul Gandhi—will significantly influence policymaking, potentially complicating key reforms and shifting political dynamics.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s alliance (NDA) declared victory in India’s general election, however Modi’s party will now need to rely on coalition partners to govern for the first time since 2014.

Modi’s anticipated landslide win – with talk of securing up to 370 seats for his party and 30 for his allies – failed to materialize.

Regional parties are now poised to have a significant impact on the formation of the government.

What impact will this have on politics and policy in India over the coming years?

Shifting Political Landscape

  • Return of Regional Parties: With notable gains in states like Bihar, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal, strong regional parties are back, reversing declines in recent elections. The dominance of BJP in previous years had resulted in the fragmentation of several significant regional parties in Maharashtra and Bihar, but this has now reversed, and many will now look to the Assembly elections in Maharashtra in October 2024 to see if this was a one off or sustained trend.
  • Emergence of Rahul Gandhi: Rahul Gandhi played a crucial role in the success of the Congress party in the election, securing 99 seats compared to 52 in 2019. Through his Bharat Jodo Yatra (Unite India March), he energized the grassroot organizations of the party. The march, spanning 10,000 kilometers, and predominantly conducted on foot, enabled Gandhi to directly engage with the public, positioning him as a significant competitor to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
  • Ram Temple Politics: Despite high expectations, the anticipated boost to the BJP’s performance following the inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya did not materialize. Many experts had foreseen that this event would solidify the party’s position in Uttar Pradesh and other regions, but the strategy appeared to fall short. Unemployment and inflation were more important issues.

It’s noteworthy that the BJP faced defeat in Ayodhya, despite having fulfilled a campaign promise to construct the Ram Mandir at this site. This temple replaced a Mughal-era mosque from the sixteenth century that was demolished by Hindu groups in 1992. Ayodhya, considered one of Hinduism’s holiest sites, has been a focal point in Indian politics for decades.

In his first speech after the 2024 Lok Sabha results, Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised tough decisions in his third term, despite the BJP’s reduced numbers in Parliament.

Policy Agenda & Challenges for Modi’s Third Term

Given the shifting political landscape and parliamentary arithmetic, what might we expect in terms of the direction of policy in the coming years?

  • Fiscal and Economic Policy: Prime Minister Modi’s reduced mandate may result in increased populist spending to bolster political support. Additionally, the July budget is expected to outline the government’s strategy for utilizing the Reserve Bank of India’s substantial Rs 2.11 lakh crore surplus transfer.This surplus could either be used to strengthen the fiscal position or to secure political backing.
    • The increase in populist spending may lead to slip away from the fiscal deficit target in the short-term. However, the government is expected to return to fiscal consolidation in the medium term. The upcoming budget will provide more clarity on policy choices. The medium-term economic outlook continues to remain strong, given the solid economic fundamentals.
  • Labor Laws: The Prime Minister is planning to introduce further business-friendly economic reforms, such as easing regulations on hiring and firing workers. Now within a coalition government, this may become more problematic and require compromise.
  • Manufacturing: To fulfill an election pledge to transform India into a global manufacturing hub, Modi plans to offer subsidies for domestic production, similar to recent incentives for semiconductor and electric vehicle industries. We expect this as an immediate action by the NDA administration, possibly in the budget next month.
  • Taxes: Modi also plans to reduce import taxes on key inputs for locally-made goods, which have pushed up India’s manufacturing costs. This could be one of the early announcements in the budget next month.
  • Uniform Civil Code: All signs suggest that Modi 3.0 will lean on N Chandrababu Naidu and Nitish Kumar, both of whom are known for their secular stances bordering on minority appeasement. Building a consensus on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) remains highly challenging.
  • One Nation, One Election: A high-level committee led by former president Ramnath Kovind recommended certain constitutional amendments. Regional parties, including the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), oppose holding state and central elections simultaneously, fearing it could undermine their influence.
  • Land reforms: One of the Modi government’s initial setbacks was its inability to build consensus for liberalizing land reforms in 2015, postponing the initiative until gaining a full majority. With a coalition government likely, the Modi administration will need to rely on states to maintain the momentum of India’s soaring economy and prevent any decline.

In summary, the outcome of the 2024 elections provides the Modi government with challenges but also opportunities to collaborate with regional parties, building a more inclusive, sustainable growth agenda. Critical to success, will be defining a new socio-economic agenda in the following areas:

  • Job creation: Ensuring employment opportunities is vital not only for economic growth but also for social stability and individual well-being. By focusing on job creation, the new government can address unemployment rates, improve living standards, and harness the potential of India’s youth. This focus will be essential for fostering a prosperous and inclusive economy that benefits all citizens.
  • Infrastructure Development: Accelerating infrastructure projects, particularly in transport, energy, and digital connectivity, to bolster economic growth, create employment opportunities, and enhance India’s overall competitiveness on the global stage.
  • Investment and Employment Generation: Stimulating investment inflows, both domestic and foreign, and fostering an environment conducive to entrepreneurship and job creation to address the pressing issue of unemployment and drive inclusive growth across all sectors of society.
  • Social Welfare and Health: Strengthening social welfare programs, prioritizing healthcare infrastructure, and ensuring access to quality healthcare services for all citizens to build a healthier and more resilient society.
  • Digital Transformation: Emphasizing digital innovation, technology adoption, and cybersecurity measures to propel India towards becoming a digital powerhouse, fostering innovation, enhancing governance efficiency, and powering economic progress.

Conclusion

The 2024 election results mark a turning point in Indian politics. Modi’s third term will be shaped by coalition dynamics, with regional parties gaining leverage and influencing national priorities. While key reforms in manufacturing, job creation, and infrastructure development are still on the agenda, their implementation will require broader consensus and negotiation. This shift presents both challenges and opportunities—forcing the central government to adopt a more collaborative, inclusive, and pragmatic approach. Success will depend on Modi’s ability to navigate these new political realities, balance populist pressures with fiscal discipline, and maintain economic momentum amid growing demands for equitable and sustainable growth.

Recent News

View All News
Public Affairs

How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of the complex operating environment in sub-Saharan Africa by unpacking How Does Mining Regulation Work in the DRC. Last revised through major amendments in 2018, the DRC’s regulatory framework, governed by the Mining Code and Mining Regulations, seeks to balance mineral sovereignty with international investments. While the government has made notable efforts to improve compliance by aligning its policies with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), the operational landscape remains heavily characterized by severe implementation gaps, infrastructure bottlenecks, and institutional capacity constraints. For global mining and energy investors, navigating the country's strategic cobalt, copper, and gold reserves requires a sophisticated approach to rising fiscal demands, strict local ownership requirements, and rapidly shifting geopolitical alliances.
Read post
Latin America

How do I get a product approved through ANVISA in Brazil without it taking five years?

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on accelerating market entry within Brazil's healthcare sector by analyzing how to optimize ANVISA Approval Times. A widespread perception among international life sciences firms is that navigating Brazil's national health regulator is a prohibitive, five-year endeavor. However, an operational analysis reveals that this timeline is rarely driven by the statutory framework itself, which mandates legal review deadlines of 120 days for priority cases and 365 days for ordinary ones. Instead, prolonged market access bottlenecks are primarily structural and behavioral, caused by mismatched dossier formatting, a failure to utilize optimized fast-track sub-categories, and falling into successive technical clarification cycles (fila de exigências). To counter these systemic delays, multinational corporations (MNCs) must pivot toward a sophisticated regulatory strategy built on regulatory reliance pathways, early alignment with optimized priority definitions, and precise tracking of ANVISA’s shifting technical parameters.
Read post
Social License To Operate

What is the difference between a legal permit and a social license for mining companies?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of an increasingly critical barrier to capital deployment in the global extractive sector: The Difference Between a Legal Permit and a Social Licence. While a legal permit grants a mining enterprise the formal, statutory approval from local authorities to operate, it represents only one half of the execution equation. This briefing explores why a social licence to operate—defined as the complex political, economic, and social dynamics within local communities—is equally indispensable for long-term project delivery. Without a resilient framework for community alignment, operations face severe reputational and operational risks, where local stakeholders can effectively block projects through strikes, legal challenges, protests, and infrastructure disruption. To mitigate these cascading bottlenecks, international mining companies must shift from purely transactional compliance to active, culturally attuned stakeholder engagement.
Read post