Tax reform is the word of the day in Brazil

Under Lula’s new government, Brazil’s economic ministries have been separated again, reversing Bolsonaro’s centralization. The Speyside Latin America team is closely analyzing Brazil's new government, a key high-growth and emerging market. Lula's move to split the Economy Ministry creates a new, complex power dynamic focused on tax reform and a "green" industrial policy. Understanding this landscape is critical for any Corporate Affairs strategy, as detailed in our latest report.

Tax reform is priority of the three ministries that administer the real economy: Finance (MF), Planning and Budget (MPO), and Development, Industry, Trade and Services (MDIC). Bolsonaro had united these three to form the Ministry of Economy, which concentrated too much decision power in just one person. Lula has rearranged these ministries to act as separate entities, just as before.

This means that the Industrial Policy is back on the agenda. This is important as Brazil is currently facing a severe industry crisis and is not the driving force contributing to the country’s GDP (it was once the main force, but now is behind services and farming sectors). Vice-President Geraldo Alckmin, the captain of MDIC, is putting all his chips into the green economy.

While Lula empowered three heavy politicians with important ministries, it has also made room for fights for protagonism. Let’s remember that Simone Tebet disputed the past Presidential election, and both Haddad and Alckmin were in the race in 2018. Alckmin also almost won in 2006, losing only to Mr. Lula in the second round. At this point in time, with Lula pledging that he will not go for a fourth term, all three names are in the run.

The success of these three ministries will depend on Lula’s ability to make them work together for a common objective, hence the tax reform.

At Speyside Group we have analyzed the economic landscape in Brazil and identified the main agendas and challenges ahead of the country’s administration. This report contains a brief local analysis of the Ministries of Finance (MF), Planning and Budget (MPO), and Development, Industry, Trade and Services (MDIC), along with the sector trends and opportunities that 2023 will bring to Brazil.

Download the report here: New Government: Finance agenda

‍

Conclusion

The split of the economic super-ministry into three distinct entities brings both opportunities and political tension. Each minister—Tebet, Haddad, and Alckmin—has presidential ambitions and considerable political weight, which may lead to rivalry but also push for results. Their collaboration is essential to deliver on key goals like tax reform and reviving Brazil’s struggling industrial sector. Lula’s ability to balance their influence and unify efforts will determine whether the country can navigate its economic challenges effectively in 2023 and beyond.

Recent News

View All News

Latin America

How do I get a product approved through ANVISA in Brazil without it taking five years?

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on accelerating market entry within Brazil's healthcare sector by analyzing how to optimize ANVISA Approval Times. A widespread perception among international life sciences firms is that navigating Brazil's national health regulator is a prohibitive, five-year endeavor. However, an operational analysis reveals that this timeline is rarely driven by the statutory framework itself, which mandates legal review deadlines of 120 days for priority cases and 365 days for ordinary ones. Instead, prolonged market access bottlenecks are primarily structural and behavioral, caused by mismatched dossier formatting, a failure to utilize optimized fast-track sub-categories, and falling into successive technical clarification cycles (fila de exigências). To counter these systemic delays, multinational corporations (MNCs) must pivot toward a sophisticated regulatory strategy built on regulatory reliance pathways, early alignment with optimized priority definitions, and precise tracking of ANVISA’s shifting technical parameters.

Read post

Social License To Operate

What is the difference between a legal permit and a social license for mining companies?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of an increasingly critical barrier to capital deployment in the global extractive sector: The Difference Between a Legal Permit and a Social Licence. While a legal permit grants a mining enterprise the formal, statutory approval from local authorities to operate, it represents only one half of the execution equation. This briefing explores why a social licence to operate—defined as the complex political, economic, and social dynamics within local communities—is equally indispensable for long-term project delivery. Without a resilient framework for community alignment, operations face severe reputational and operational risks, where local stakeholders can effectively block projects through strikes, legal challenges, protests, and infrastructure disruption. To mitigate these cascading bottlenecks, international mining companies must shift from purely transactional compliance to active, culturally attuned stakeholder engagement.

Read post

Latin America

Colombia's Defining Moment: What the 2026 Election Means for Investors

Speyside Group analyzes the dramatic market shifts within Colombia's presidential race following the landmark first-round election results on May 31, 2026. Surpassing all pre-election projections, political outsider and far-right candidate Abelardo de la Espriella secured 43.7% of the vote, capturing more than 10 million ballots. He will face left-wing candidate Iván Cepeda of the ruling Pacto Histórico coalition—who finished second with 40.9%—in a highly consequential runoff set for June 21. This surprise outcome has completely upended a race that previously favored Cepeda, triggering immediate institutional tension. While the current Petro administration has publicly questioned the preliminary vote count without evidence, Colombia’s major business associations—including the Consejo Gremial Nacional and ANDI—have demanded absolute respect for the results and called for international oversight. For multinational corporations, this binary, ideologically stark choice carries massive investor implications for foreign direct investment (FDI), tax structures, and regulatory stability across the energy, mining, and infrastructure sectors.

Read post