With a surprise first-round result and a runoff set for June 21, Colombia's presidential race has become one of Latin America's most consequential business and investment stories of the year.
What happened on May 31
Colombia's first-round presidential election delivered one of the most surprising results in the country's recent political history. Abelardo de la Espriella — a lawyer, businessman, and political outsider running on a far-right, security-focused platform — surpassed all pre-election projections to secure 43.7% of the vote and more than 10 million ballots. His opponent in the upcoming runoff, Iván Cepeda, the government-backed candidate of the ruling Pacto Histórico coalition, came in second with 40.9%. No candidate reached the 50% threshold required for an outright win, setting the stage for a decisive second round on June 21.
The result upended a race that had for months favoured Cepeda. It also triggered an immediate institutional tension: President Gustavo Petro and Cepeda himself publicly questioned the preliminary vote count without presenting evidence, while the country's main business associations — including the Consejo Gremial Nacional and the ANDI — called for respect of the results and requested international oversight of the process.
“What is now clear is that Colombian voters face a binary, ideologically stark choice: between a far-right candidate with strong business and investor backing, and a left-wing candidate who represents continuity with the Petro era. For companies and investors operating in or considering Colombia, the stakes could hardly be higher”, says Silvia Ardila, Regional Director LATAM at Speyside Group
Abelardo de la Espriella- Far Right
De la Espriella ran a campaign explicitly aimed at restoring investor confidence after four years of what the business community widely viewed as a hostile regulatory environment under Petro. His platform prioritises private-sector growth, security, and a more open posture toward foreign capital. His running mate, José Manuel Restrepo — a former Finance Minister under President Iván Duque — has been widely read as a signal to markets and multilateral institutions that fiscal discipline and investor-friendly governance would be central to a De la Espriella administration.
A De la Espriella presidency would represent the most significant shift in Colombia's investment climate since 2022 — and potentially one of the most consequential for the energy and mining sectors in over a decade.
For the energy and natural resources sector specifically, a De la Espriella win would likely mean a reversal — or at minimum a significant softening — of Petro's restrictions on new hydrocarbon exploration. Both De la Espriella and outgoing candidate Paloma Valencia supported the expansion of oil and gas permitting, including hydraulic fracking, and a normalisation of the relationship between the government and the extractive industries. Foreign mining and energy companies that have been navigating an increasingly uncertain regulatory environment would find a considerably more predictable counterpart in Bogotá.
Read related content: One Left, Two Rights: Colombia’s 2026 Election and What Investors Should Watch
Iván Cepeda Pacto Histórico / Left
Cepeda represents policy continuity with the Petro government. As a longtime senator and human rights advocate, his platform maintains the Pacto Histórico's emphasis on social spending, progressive land reform, and restrictions on fossil fuel expansion. A Cepeda presidency would, in all probability, extend the current trajectory on foreign direct investment — which has declined for four consecutive years under Petro, falling from a peak of US$13.2 billion in annual FDI in 2023 to US$9.2 billion in 2025.
Cepeda has also signalled continuity with Petro's energy transition agenda, which prioritises renewable development but has simultaneously created significant uncertainty for the hydrocarbon sector through exploration bans and contract disputes. For investors in oil, gas, and mining, a Cepeda win would likely mean an extension of the current cautious posture that has characterised foreign capital behaviour in Colombia since 2022.
Read related content: Colombia’s 2026 Elections: Stability, Constraints, and What Investors Should Really Be Watching
The investor view: what to watch
Markets have already begun pricing the electoral outcome. The Colombian peso has shown sensitivity to polling movements throughout the campaign. De la Espriella's strong first-round performance — substantially outperforming expectations could be received positively by investors who had positioned for a potential right-wing win. The key question is whether the approximately 15% of votes that went to third-party candidates, including centrist Sergio Fajardo, will consolidate toward one camp in the runoff.
De la Espriella — investor implications
— Normalisation of hydrocarbon permits and fracking regulation
— FDI recovery expected in mining, oil & gas, and infrastructure
— Tax incentives for private investment; fiscal restraint agenda
— vice President candidate Restrepo signals macroeconomic credibility to markets
— Stronger alignment with US trade and investment priorities
— Risk: governance challenges if elected on populist mandate
Cepeda — investor implications
— Continuation of hydrocarbon restrictions and energy transition agenda
— FDI likely to remain subdued
— Higher corporate tax burden; expanded state role in energy sector
— Risk of institutional friction if election legitimacy is contested
— Social spending continuity may support domestic consumption
— Renewable energy pipeline potentially maintained
How Speyside can help
Speyside Group advises investors, multinationals, and senior executives on political risk, public affairs, and corporate strategy in Colombia and across Latin America. We combine on-the-ground intelligence with deep institutional relationships to help our clients navigate uncertainty and make informed decisions at critical moments.
As Colombia heads into its most consequential runoff in a generation, we provide bespoke briefings on the electoral outlook, scenario planning for each presidential outcome, and strategic counsel on how to position — across energy, natural resources, financial services, and regulated industries — in either scenario.
Conclusion
Beyond the immediate electoral outcome, investors should monitor two risks that apply regardless of who wins: the institutional stability of the electoral process itself — Cepeda's refusal to accept the preliminary count introduces a degree of uncertainty that could extend into the runoff — and the broader security environment, which both candidates have placed at the centre of their campaigns but approach through fundamentally different lenses.
Our team is available for confidential consultations ahead of the June 21 runoff and in the weeks following the result, as the new government's policy direction becomes clear.
For more information please contact:
Silvia Ardila
Regional Director LATAM
Silvia.ardila@speyside-group.com


