All posts
Published
June 23, 2025

In PR, measure what matters

Our Head for the Andean and South Cone Region, part of the Speyside Latin America team, breaks down the million-dollar question in Corporate Affairs: measuring PR. We argue against vanity metrics, focusing instead on impact. Our Speyside Communications strategy, powered by our proprietary in.sight tool, analyzes the landscape in high-growth and emerging markets to build a roadmap that ensures our content is meaningful and drives real business outcomes.

Our Head for the Andean and South Cone Region, part of the Speyside Latin America team, breaks down the million-dollar question in Corporate Affairs: measuring PR. We argue against vanity metrics, focusing instead on impact. Our Speyside Communications strategy, powered by our proprietary in.sight tool, analyzes the landscape in high-growth and emerging markets to build a roadmap that ensures our content is meaningful and drives real business outcomes.

By: Silvia Ardila, Head for Andean and South Cone Region at Speyside Group

What to measure in PR is often the million-dollar question when it comes to launching an external communications strategy. The answer is not easy: some believe that PR impact is impossible to measure, while others rely on widespread metrics such as number of clicks, reach or ad equivalency, which have the advantage of simplicity but provide little context. There are other more meaningful measurements out there, we just have to shift focus from output to impact, always referring back to the objectives and strategy at play.

Before measuring, analyze

Before jumping into the ring and setting up PR goals, it is always advisable to take a step back and invite companies and brands to analyze where they are starting from. If they have just arrived to a new market they could and should do audience research, understand what competitors are doing, what kind of stories are gaining traction, how, where and when.

If a company or brand already has a presence in the market, what does it look like? What opportunities have been well exploited – news, events, thought leadership – and what white spaces and areas of opportunity still exist in the short, medium and long-term?

All this is crucial for two reasons: in order not to saturate media and other channels with the same sort of information they already receive from others, and in order to ensure you are uniquely positioning a company or brand to set it apart from competitors.

Seeing the challenges that our clients face when trying to define roadmaps in new markets, Speyside Group has designed a tool called in.sight that analyzes the current landscape, identifies areas of opportunity and provides recommendations based on local realities. When you have all this information it is easier to create a clear strategic roadmap and set key and measurable PR objectives and metrics that can evolve over time…

Content as a pillar

A one-size-fits-all approach to measuring content does not make sense. We should consider to consider the objective, audience, channels and how the content will translate across a wide variety of different platforms.

That’s why we do not recommend just focusing on the ‘number of clippings’ obtained or the ‘Ad Equivalency’ value, but rather which messages you want to target to which audience and what action or response you are trying to drive in each case. If it was a content aimed at doctors, did it reach publications that they read, even if there are few in the market? If it is a content inviting them to take part in a food promotion, did it reach the target demographic and drive sign ups on the customers’ website?

In order to set up the best metrics for content impact we must consider what the audience cares about. Alll brands believe that their story is extremely interesting. But the reality is that it is not always. So whoever writes the content must take a step back and think about what the audience they want to reach cares about, what informs, educates and entertains them and how to tell the right story in the right tone always keeping in mind the brands’ call. Let’s remember that we are competing with an ocean of information and that no one wants to read advertising but meaningful stories.

And how do you measure impact?

There are many PR strategies beyond content that we could mention here. But the important thing to keep in mind is that we should not always use the same metrics. Public Relations are “relationships”, so there are many other aspects that are not always tangible but that give an account of the success of a strategy.

For example, are you having the opportunity to share relevant news with your potential customers, are they commenting on those? Is the PR area listening to the business area to understand what those customer pains are and using this to find out what external audiences are looking for? Is the local media looking for your spokespeople? Are published news being shared and commented? Are shared materials such as ebooks being downloaded?

There are many ideas for measurement you just have to make sure you are looking for the rights ones.

Conclusion

PR measurement isn’t one-size-fits-all. To demonstrate true value, companies must tailor metrics to their goals, audience, and content purpose—focusing on relationships, engagement, and meaningful outcomes rather than vanity numbers.

Recent News

View All News
Latin America

How do I get a product approved through ANVISA in Brazil without it taking five years?

Speyside Group provides a strategic perspective on accelerating market entry within Brazil's healthcare sector by analyzing how to optimize ANVISA Approval Times. A widespread perception among international life sciences firms is that navigating Brazil's national health regulator is a prohibitive, five-year endeavor. However, an operational analysis reveals that this timeline is rarely driven by the statutory framework itself, which mandates legal review deadlines of 120 days for priority cases and 365 days for ordinary ones. Instead, prolonged market access bottlenecks are primarily structural and behavioral, caused by mismatched dossier formatting, a failure to utilize optimized fast-track sub-categories, and falling into successive technical clarification cycles (fila de exigências). To counter these systemic delays, multinational corporations (MNCs) must pivot toward a sophisticated regulatory strategy built on regulatory reliance pathways, early alignment with optimized priority definitions, and precise tracking of ANVISA’s shifting technical parameters.
Read post
Social License To Operate

What is the difference between a legal permit and a social license for mining companies?

Speyside Group provides an analytical assessment of an increasingly critical barrier to capital deployment in the global extractive sector: The Difference Between a Legal Permit and a Social Licence. While a legal permit grants a mining enterprise the formal, statutory approval from local authorities to operate, it represents only one half of the execution equation. This briefing explores why a social licence to operate—defined as the complex political, economic, and social dynamics within local communities—is equally indispensable for long-term project delivery. Without a resilient framework for community alignment, operations face severe reputational and operational risks, where local stakeholders can effectively block projects through strikes, legal challenges, protests, and infrastructure disruption. To mitigate these cascading bottlenecks, international mining companies must shift from purely transactional compliance to active, culturally attuned stakeholder engagement.
Read post
Latin America

Colombia's Defining Moment: What the 2026 Election Means for Investors

Speyside Group analyzes the dramatic market shifts within Colombia's presidential race following the landmark first-round election results on May 31, 2026. Surpassing all pre-election projections, political outsider and far-right candidate Abelardo de la Espriella secured 43.7% of the vote, capturing more than 10 million ballots. He will face left-wing candidate Iván Cepeda of the ruling Pacto Histórico coalition—who finished second with 40.9%—in a highly consequential runoff set for June 21. This surprise outcome has completely upended a race that previously favored Cepeda, triggering immediate institutional tension. While the current Petro administration has publicly questioned the preliminary vote count without evidence, Colombia’s major business associations—including the Consejo Gremial Nacional and ANDI—have demanded absolute respect for the results and called for international oversight. For multinational corporations, this binary, ideologically stark choice carries massive investor implications for foreign direct investment (FDI), tax structures, and regulatory stability across the energy, mining, and infrastructure sectors.
Read post